01
Soft blur is discreet, but context matters
Soft blur usually preserves the natural look of creator footage and is less distracting when many people cross the frame. It is a visual treatment, however, and should be checked at the final export resolution. A blur that looks sufficient in a small preview may reveal more structure on a large display.
Use stronger settings when the face is large, static or central to the frame. The aim is to make identification unreasonable in the intended viewing conditions.
02
Pixelation and solid masks trade subtlety for certainty
Pixelation communicates redaction clearly and can work well in documentary or operational footage. Its strength depends on block size relative to the face, so resolution changes matter.
A solid privacy mask removes more visual information and is easier to verify. It is often the safer choice for highly sensitive HR, safeguarding or claims material, though it changes the image more noticeably.
- Creator footage: start with a sufficiently strong blur.
- Internal evidence: prioritise non-identifiability.
- High-risk disclosure: consider an opaque mask and stricter review.
03
Test the exported file
Never approve a style from a still frame alone. Check motion, scaling, compression and moments when tracking changes size. Review at normal speed, then inspect flagged or crowded sections frame by frame.
Document the chosen style in the job record so a reviewer understands the intended protection level.
Apply the workflow
Review real footage locally.
CensorFlow detects and tracks visible faces on your Windows PC, then lets a person correct and approve the result before export.