Architecture comparison
Local vs cloud face blurring: security, speed and cost
A balanced architecture comparison for teams choosing where video processing should happen.
Bottom line
The correct choice depends on transfer constraints, workstation capacity, review workflow and volume—not ideology.
Best fit
Who should shortlist this workflow?
01
Security and privacy review
02
Procurement teams
03
High-volume video operations
Decision matrix
Compare the complete operating model.
CriterionLocal assisted approachQuestion for alternatives
Transfer
No video upload required
Requires secure transfer and vendor controls
Scale
Bounded by customer hardware
Can use elastic vendor compute
Pricing
Predictable licence model
Often usage-based and easier for occasional jobs
Pilot questions
Ask these before approval.
- 01What is the total data path?
- 02How long are uploads and outputs retained?
- 03What happens at peak volume?
- 04Which model produces the lowest approved-output cost?
Run the test
Use representative footage.
Test profiles, crowds, low light, reflections and the exact export settings your team uses. Measure approved output and hands-on time—not a perfect marketing clip.